2650's are great little routers - we have one here that commonly handles up to 30Mbit+ traffic without passing 40% CPU.
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Hire, Ejay wrote: > Have you checked the utilization on those 2650's? I'd bet it's never gotten > above 15%. The 2650's can handle a lot more than 1 t-1's worth of traffic. > > -Ejay > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Internet Router? [7:33639] > > > The 3640 will work for you. I would definitely max out the RAM. Some > others have commented about not needing full BGP route tables. My customers > have been very happy with partial tables as described in the following CCO > link. I have also had customers use 2 2650's, 1 T-1 per connection box, > HSRP on the Ethernet port and run IBGP between each other for optimal > routing. I then configured them with the below link. > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/459/41.shtml > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Scott Nawalaniec > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Internet Router? [7:33639] > > > Hello Everybody, > > I just want to run this by everyone for their input from experience. > > Scenario: > I'm looking for a Cisco router that will be providing Internet connectivity > running BGP and that will be able to handle the capacity of 2 PTP T1's to > the Internet. I know minimum RAM will have to be 64mbs for BGP routes. I > just want to know what people have tried that does and doesn't work. > > My choice would be a 3640 for future T1 expandability and/or a HSSI port. > > Thank you for the input. > > Scott -- Ian Henderson CCNA, CCNP Network Engineer, iiNet Limited Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33815&t=33639 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
