The server must be set with the non-standard 300 second timer also? That would be my theory.
Priscilla At 02:50 PM 2/5/02, Tom Martin wrote: >Does anyone have any idea why this worked??? Setting the RIP and SAP >timers on a __LAN__ link should have had no positive effect. It seems >like the only perceivable change would be the flapping of remote networks >and servers -- assuming that the timers were not modified on the server >also. > >Any thoughts??? > >- Tom > >On Tue, 05 Feb 2002 13:21:55 -0500, Fraasch James wrote: > > > Ah, to be a network engineer!!! The fun!!! > > > > So here it is, 28 hours later I have fallen across the solution to the > > problem I posted yesterday where people were not able to access an IPX > > server. Users were actually able to access it but for no more than a > > few minutes at a time. > > > > Had to add the following command to interface that houses the server: > > > > interface TokenRing1/2 > > mac-address 0200.1099.81ca > > ip address 172.25.71.200 255.255.255.0 ip directed-broadcast ipx > > encapsulation SNAP > > ipx network A040 > > ipx update interval rip 300 > > ipx update interval sap 300 > > ring-speed 16 > > > > IPX update intervals for rip and sap seem to have solved the problem. > > > > Thought you might want to know. > > > > Thanks for the help! Now lets just hope I keep my job! Just kidding, I > > can blame it on only being with the company a few months. I'm the new > > guy, I can make mistakes and not get in trouble....I think that's how it > > works. > > > > James > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________ Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34506&t=34485 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
