Correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to remember that MAC- address access lists only work on bridged interfaces. Is that the case? I seem to remember reading that somewhere. I'll have to double check.
John ________________________________________________ Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag ---- On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Chuck Larrieu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > absolutely. you want something in either the 700-799 range or 1100-1199 > range. see router output below:I've never actually implemented one of > these > in real or lab. the choices seem to be permit or deny. There does not > appear > to be a lot of flexibility here, as with an IP access list. > > R1(config)#access-list ? (edited ) > Extended 48-bit MAC address access list > 48-bit MAC address access list > > HTH > > Chuck > > > ""Charles Lomotey"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi, > > > > Is it possible to block a MAC address on an interface by accesslist > > or.....?? > > > > I have this annoying customer playing around with their IP adresses > and > > bringing down the whole network > > Charles > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34980&t=34953 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
