Oops, I looked it up and what do you know... these's a nice field for
bandwidth and delay.
""Steven A. Ridder""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> It's not in a packet that gets sent.
>
>
> ""Sasa Milic""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > The router DOES pass total delay and minumum bandwidth of the route
> > to neighbors.
> >
> > check "show ip eigrp topologu
> >
> > Sasa
> > CCIE No 8635
> >
> >
> >
> > "Steven A. Ridder" wrote:
> > >
> > > I believe the delay is by default set on the interface by the router
> based
> > > on the type of link it is.  I'm sure there's charts on CCO somewhere.
> You
> > > can change this info on the interface with the delay command, which is
> the
> > > recommended way of changing a metric if you are forced to do so.  The
> > router
> > > dosen't pass the delay info of a link to other routers as a raw
figure,
> it
> > > calculates the BW and delay, then multiplies it by 256 and sends that
> > > calculation to a neighbor, which is the metric.
> > >
> > > ""Yatou Wu""  wrote in message
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > In EIGRP, the delay metric is taken as configured in the interface
of
> the
> > > > router by the administrator, by default, or by measurement?
> > > >
> > > > when the router calculates the metric, it needs to know the minimum
> > > > bandwidth along the path, and also the delay along the path. how can
> the
> > > > router pass the infor around? pass the total delay along the path,
or
> > > delay
> > > > of every link?
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > > yatou
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36014&t=36001
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to