That http thing is not a security plus i agree, i remember seeing an
advisory on that a bit back..
Bri
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Patrick Bass wrote:
> IMO, they should remove HTTP access completely!! If you're looking for a
> secure connection to the router, try SSH, or use TACACS+...
>
> ""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hum! Suprisingly it has the http built-in. I would think that they should
> > have implemented ssl functionality in the code than http....
> >
> >
> > >From: "Steven A. Ridder"
> > >Reply-To: "Steven A. Ridder"
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Re: https to log in to a router - Possible?? [7:36143]
> > >Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 20:22:00 -0500
> > >
> > >The router would have to have a web server with ssl built in, and I
don't
> > >believe Cisco's do.
> > >""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > Hello,
> > > > Is it possible to use https://xxxx to access a router? I have just
> been
> > > > thinking about this and would like to know if and how it would indeed
> be
> > > > possible?
> > > > An acl permitting 443 would not work as it is not for traffic
> > >originating
> > > > from the router itself, correct?
> > > > Is there like a access-class cmd. for https at all?
> > > > Thank you.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> > > > http://www.hotmail.com
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36174&t=36143
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]