to me b and d are out of the running because they are looking to prevent
people from modifying data, thats an application issue. So youre left
with a and c. A seems to be a problem best solved by putting the info on
separate drives or devices, so I vote c. A case could be made for a
however, if you say put the data on separate devices then use the firewall
to permit some access and prevent others. I'm stickin with c.
Brian
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Clayton Dukes wrote:
> Hmmm....
>
>
> Clayton Dukes
> CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC
> (h) 904-292-1881
> (c) 904-477-7825
> #rm -rf /bin/laden
> #kill -9 /bin/laden
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Love Cisco"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:15 PM
> Subject: Please help me answer this question [7:36295]
>
>
> > 1. Which of the following customers can probably meet their security
> > requirements with a simple firewall system?
> > A. Company ABC wants to make sure customers can see public marketing data
> > but not proprietary sales figures.
> > B. University ABC want to make sure students can see but not change their
> > grades in administrative database.
> > C. Company XYZ wants to make sure employees do not download software from
> > unauthorized site.
> > D. University XYZ wants to make sure that public central software
> developed
> > at the university stops working after a period of time if the user does
> not
> > pay shareware fees.
> > =============================================
> > I think C is right. But some people think A.
> >
> > What do you think? Why?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36307&t=36295
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
