>The real purpose is just to make life more complicated.
>
>Seriously, I cannot even think of a single reason why I would ever want to
>use PPPoFR in real life.

Rahul is perfectly correct.

In the SP world, regulatory concerns may enter. For example, in the 
US, an ILEC can't terminate IP as part of its basic service. It can 
use IP in its infrastructure, as, for example, putting an L2TP proxy 
client in one of its POPs, extracting the PPP, and then sending the 
PPP to the ultimate server at the ISP. If the transport for that last 
leg happened to be FR, PPPoFR might be an alternative, although I 
tend to prefer L2TP.

>
>
>
>
>
>
>""Rahul Kachalia""  wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>  John,
>>
>>      PPPoFR solution is to maintain leased line PPP end to end over SP's
FR
>>  backbone..Following is the sample topology :
>>
>>  CPE--PPP/LL--SP--FR+PPP--SP--PPP/LL--CPE
>>
>>      But later started using in Broadband environment with following
>topology
>>  :
>>
>>  CPE--PPPoFR/xDSL--DSLAM--PPPoFR--SP--PPPoFR--ISP/Wholesale provider
>>
>>      But now you will find PPPoE, oEoA, oA & oEoVLAN, as you can see
>several
>>  L2 tech. is used but the goal is to maintain PPP end-to-end due to its
>>  feature for AAA purpose..
>>
>>  thanks,
>>  rahul.
>>
>>
>>  ""John Neiberger""  wrote in message
>>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>  > I believe someone might have mentioned this recently but since
>>  > I'm studying it right now I thought I'd ask again...
>>  >
>>  > What the heck would be a real-world application of PPP over
>>  > Frame Relay?  If you want it for the authentication this is a
>>  > lot of work!
>>  >
>>  > You need to setup a subinterface *and* a virtual template for
>>  > every PVC!  What a pain.... Then again, if you're using
>>  > multipoint interfaces you'd simply use ip unnumbered and a
>>  > single virtual template.
>>  >
>>  > Hmm....  what might we actually do with this?  Interestingly, I
>>  > just combined two features that I've never configured before:
>>  > PPPoFR and FREEK.  It makes my config look fairly odd.  :-)
>>  >
>  > > John

-- 
"What Problem are you trying to solve?"
***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not 
directly to me***
********************************************************************************
Howard C. Berkowitz      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications
Technical Director, CertificationZone.com
"retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36342&t=36300
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to