"european-format"? I thought it was "everywhere except the US format"!
;-)
JMcL
----- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 28/02/2002 01:47 pm -----
"Steven A. Ridder"
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
28/02/2002 12:26 pm
Please respond to "Steven A. Ridder"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: HELP !! CCIE 2B or NOT? [7:36542]
Australia uses "european-format" time as well?
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> However if you do this I suggest you use a less ambiguous date format -
my
> first reaction is "oh, so you did the lab in January - but did you
pass??"
>
> JMcL
> ----- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 28/02/2002 10:57 am -----
>
>
> "Jeff Buehler"
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 28/02/2002 09:29 am
> Please respond to "Jeff Buehler"
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject: Re: HELP !! CCIE 2B or NOT? [7:36542]
>
>
> Perhaps it would be more appropriate to put your lab date instead of the
> "CCIE Written" if you want to demonstrate where you are in your
> pursuit...for example.
>
> CCIE R/S LAB 6-1-2002 RTP
>
> ""Tim Booth"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Certainly that was conceptually clear. I think this is probably an
> > issue of semantics, but either way, I believe there is an exception to
> > be made due to the fact that this is a cisco study list. Where you are
> > in your studies could have some bearing on the immediate level of
detail
> > in responses one gets, because it indicates the level of detail you
> > would desire. I really don't think that it is inappropriate to
indicate
> > where you are in your cisco studies on a cisco mailing group.
> >
> > I, like you, would not agree to putting "MCSE Win2k Pro and Server"
on
> > a cisco email list, but being appropriately detailed should be ok. I
> > believe that the difference between a CCNP, CCDP, or CCIP and someone
> > who takes the IE written is great enough to warrant such a
distinction.
> > I know I learned a lot between my DP and my IE written. I like to be
> > thorough, and answering as many pertinent questions as possible in one
> > email, be it stated or unstated, is appropriate.
> >
> > As far as dealing with semantics, it is possible to restructure the
> > appendage, but why would that truly be necessary. If you think about
it,
> > the best shorthand for someone who passed the CCIE written would be
> > "CCIE written." If it is to be suggested that I can't use CCIE in a
> > phrase simply because it *by itself* represents something different
than
> > what I'm implying, that would be a little silly.
> >
> > I'm not trying to get a job with this title, or pretend to be
> > something I'm not; just indicating where I'm at.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Tim Booth
> > MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little
temporary
> > safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
> > Benjamin Franklin, 1759
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of
> > Solar
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 7:47
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: HELP !! CCIE 2B or NOT? [7:36542]
> >
> > Have no clear idea of why the CCIE Written should be dropped. Unless
you
> > pass both written and lab exams, then append the CCIE after your name
> >
> > Compare it to the following
> > "Name"
> > CCNA, CCNP Routing Switching, BSc 3rd year, CCIE Written, MCSE Win2K
Pro
> > and
> > Server, MBA 1st semester
> >
> > Is it conceptually clear to you ?
> >
> > Thank you
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36760&t=36542
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
