suppose you were to add a third router into the mix, and throw in some loopbacks just for kicks
router_1-----------router_2------------router_3 same numbering scheme for the 1-2 link. bet router 3 would see the /30 or if you don't have a third router, just create a bunch of /30 loopbacks out of the same major network. you'll see those /30s show up, providing you have the "no auto-summary" engaged. at present, there is no need for the rip process to differentiate since there is only one network known to it, and that one is directly connected. Chuck ""Stanzin Takpa"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].; > I did the no auto-summary and also on ip classless, but the situation is > same . > > stanzin > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Knox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 6:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: RIP issue :-) [7:37339] > > > Rip is a CLASSFUL protocol... it can't utilize CIDR notation. Therefore, rip > sees your address as a class B address and will hence only use two octets > for the network portion, regardless of any netmask you set. Hope this helps. > > Sean > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stanzin Takpa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 4:59 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RIP issue :-) [7:37339] > > > Hi ! > I am enabling RIP b/w two p-to-p network /30. But the strange > thing is ,when I say > RouterA__.1/30___________________.2/30__RouterB > > router rip > ver 2 > network 150.1.11.0 > > and exec show runn, it is showing the network as 150.1.0.0. > > Any comment on this... > > Stanzin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37362&t=37339 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
