ROFL.... That had to suck.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven A. Ridder Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Kentrox vs. Adtran CSU/DSU [7:38252] TO me a csu is a csu. I personally don't have any preference, but I do prefer being able to configure channels on the front screen as opposed to having proprietary cables and wacky key combinations to access menus. I once had to drive 2.5 hours one way in a snow storm to Cape Cod (no I wasn't barefoot and it wasn't up hill both ways :D ) to reconfigure some channels with AT&T only to find out that I didn't have the right cables and connectors to do the cut over. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Doug Korell"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have used Kentrox Satellite 651 CSU/DSU's before but looking at the Adtran > TSU ACE CSU/DSU. Does anyone have an opinion of the Adtran? It's a little > cheaper than the Kentrox and you don't have to buy the cables which are > about $60 each for 10'. Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38273&t=38252 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
