I did some google searches and some site mentioned the A-version is the same module but the components used to make it were different and the cost was cheaper then the original.
--- Daniel Cotts wrote: > Here's the output of a "show port capabilities" on > both a 5213 and a 5213A. > No difference. I seem to remember that the "A" > version fixed some flaws in > the older blade. I have no idea what they might be. > I've found the 5213 in a 1996 catalog. The 5213A is > in the '98 catalog. If > price wasn't much different, I'd go for the newer. > > Bill_Cat5505> sh port capabilities 4 > Model WS-X5213 > Port 4/1 > Type 10/100BaseTX > Speed auto,10,100 > Duplex half,full > Trunk encap type ISL > Trunk mode > on,off,desirable,auto,nonegotiate > Channel no > Broadcast suppression pps(0-150000) > Flow control no > Security yes > Membership static,dynamic > Fast start yes > Rewrite no > *********************************** > Left5K> sh port capabilities 2 > Model WS-X5213A > Port 2/1 > Type 10/100BaseTX > Speed auto,10,100 > Duplex half,full > Trunk encap type ISL > Trunk mode > on,off,desirable,auto,nonegotiate > Channel no > Broadcast suppression pps(0-150000) > Flow control no > Security yes > Membership static,dynamic > Fast start yes > Rewrite no > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 10:21 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: ws-x5213 or ws-x5213a [7:38546] > > > > > > Anyone know the difference between these two > modules ??? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38583&t=38546 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
