Well now, wouldn't that be interesting - an ISP that didn't run an IGP....
Hmmm.....   In fact, no less an authority than Radia Perlman has touted the
merits of a single unified routing protocol that could be used for both
intra- and inter-domain routing.  For those who don't know who she is, Ms.
Perlman is one of the living legends of protocol design.  For example, she
was the principal designer of spanning-tree and ISIS, and NLSP.  She also
formulated much of the early work of link-state protocol algorithms that are
the basis of OSPF and PNNI.   She laments how we have gotten to the  status
quo of having separate intra and inter-domain protocols.


But in answer to your direct question, the answer to your question is that
because ISP's must have some way to do their interior routing,  that almost
always means an IGP is required, although I suppose in theory they could
just use static routes, although I have yet to run into one that does that.
ISP's often run BGP, but not always - for example, I've worked with some
mom+pop ISP's. that don't run BGP. If they do run BGP, it is "no-synced".
A new service-provider initiative that is being pushed by Cisco and other
vendors is to run BGP only on edge routers and have a BGP-less core that is
transited purely by  label-switching.  A dicey proposition if you ask me, as
I would think that providers are loathe to give up the control that BGP
offers.




""Steven A. Ridder""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hey guys and gals,
>
> I have never worked in an ISP, so I have no idea how they run.  I'm just
> curious, do they run an IGP in addition to IBGP and is it fully
> synchronized?  I'm just curious to see how it's done in the real world.
>
> --
>
> RFC 1149 Compliant.
> Get in my head:
> http://sar.dynu.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38619&t=38614
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to