Sure,

First two are short and sweet and described the typical relationship.

http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200201/msg00078.html
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200201/msg00081.html

Longer answer i posted sometime back

http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200201/msg00006.html

At 08:39 PM 3/27/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>Yes riddles indeed, but I can't find a resolution! If there's a simple
>answer will you please be kind and just tell me about it? Is it to:
>
>1. use confederations instead of reflectors
>2. redistribute bgp into ospf and vice versa
>3. either of the above
>4. or none of the above?
>
>Thanks for your help :)
>Tarek
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Peter van Oene
>Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:31 PM
>To: Tarek Sabry; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: BGP - Synchronization
>
>
>The archives are riddled with discussion on this topic.  Much of it very
>recent (last 2-3 months if I recall)
>
>
>At 04:06 PM 3/27/2002 -0600, Tarek Sabry wrote:
> >I can get things to work with "no sync", but I was wondering why they are
> >not otherwise. My understanding is that if the route does exist in the IGP
> >then it should be OK for advertising. What am I missing?
> >
> >Below is an illustration for my case for the 88.0.0.0 network.
> >
> >Thanks
> >Tarek
> >
> >
> >r3#sh ip bgp
> >BGP table version is 1, local router ID is 200.0.0.3
> >Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
> >internal
> >Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
> >
> >    Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> >* i8.8.8.0/24       10.10.0.8                0    100      0 i
> >* i88.0.0.0         10.10.0.8                0    100      0 i
> >* i192.168.1.0      10.10.0.8                0    100      0 i
> >* i192.168.2.0      10.10.0.8                0    100      0 i
> >r3#
> >r3#
> >r3#
> >r3#
> >r3#sh ip route 88.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
> >Routing entry for 88.0.0.0/8
> >   Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 65, type inter area
> >   Redistributing via ospf 1
> >   Last update from 10.10.0.8 on Serial0.1, 02:10:35 ago
> >   Routing Descriptor Blocks:
> >   * 10.10.0.8, from 10.10.0.8, 02:10:35 ago, via Serial0.1
> >       Route metric is 65, traffic share count is 1
> >r3#
> >r3#
> >r3#
> >r3#
> >r3#sh ip bgp 88.0.0.0
> >BGP routing table entry for 88.0.0.0/8, version 0
> >Paths: (1 available, no best path)
> >   Not advertised to any peer
> >   Local, (Received from a RR-client)
> >     10.10.0.8 (metric 64) from 10.10.0.8 (8.8.8.8)
> >       Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, not
> >synchronized, ref 2
> >r3#
> >r3#
> >
> >-----------------------------------------
> >Tarek Sabry
> >Senior Network Engineer
> >Schlumberger Network Solutions
> >-----------------------------------------
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html
> >Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list.
>_________________________________________________________________
>Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html
>Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39733&t=39733
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to