At 12:33 PM 4/3/02, Scott Nawalaniec wrote:
>To the Big Study Group Brain,
>
>Quick question:
>
>Which WAN encapsulation protocol has the least amount of overhead? PPP,
>HDLC, FR or other?

They are all about the same. A real useful answer, eh? ;-) Seriously they 
are all based on international standards for frame formatting and are very 
similar. PPP has two extra bytes to identify the next layer up, but that's 
not a big deal. Cisco's HDLC has that too actually. PPP also has a little 
extra overhead for CHAP or PAP during establishment of a circuit. Cisco 
HDLC has SLARP keepalives which are overhead. But Frame Relay has LMI and 
PPP has LCP.

The gory details of the frame formats are here:

Frame Relay:

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/frame.htm#xtocid16

PPP:

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/ppp.htm#xtocid6

SDLC (which is sometimes considered the mother of all WAN protocols):

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/sdlcetc.htm#xtocid4

Cisco's HDLC is actually a unique variety that doesn't match other vendors 
(except vendors that do Cisco HDLC). I can't find any documents that 
describe it but it has been addressed on Group Study before. Here's the 
gist of it:

Cisco's HDLC encapsulation starts with a one-byte address field. The second 
byte is a control byte that is always set to 0x00. The next two bytes are a 
protocol type field that usually matches Ethernet EtherTypes, with some 
additions for packet types that don't appear on Ethernet networks. Packets 
with type 0x8035 carry SLARP data.

Anyway, distinguishing these protocols by how much encapsulation overhead 
they have isn't necessary. You'll want to consider other 
advantages/disadvantages.

Priscilla





>Thank you for your opinions.
>
>Scott
________________________

Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40378&t=40343
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to