No speed issues. I have actually heard of MPPP being run successfully on even higher speed links, like OC-12. But I don't recommend it. Listen to the madman - use CEF.
""Woods, Randall, SOLCM"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thanks for the info. I was aware of the issues involved with running it > I just wanted to know if there was a limitation to the speed of an > interface that is allowed to perform it. I haven't seen anything that > says no but just curious. I agree CEF is a better solution if the > platform supports it. We actually run both for the customer that I > support. We haven't had any issues with either so far. > > Thanks, > Woody > CCNP > > -----Original Message----- > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: MPPP for DS-3's [7:40213] > > > As I haven ranted in the past, for parallel path load sharing just say > no to PPP. CEF works great, is efficient and easy to configure. PPP > has more overhead, interleaving, fragmentation (which yes can be > disabled and should if you choose PPP) all for what?? You can save IP > addresses but this is most often a moot point, use RFC1918 addresses. > > Dave > > "Woods, Randall, SOLCM" wrote: > > > > Has anyone ever tried to created a mullilink PPP bundle with DS-3's? A > > coworker was wondering and I never thought about it myself. I've only > > configured it for t-1's. I would assume the overhead might be bad for > the > > router instead of using CEF or just letting the routing protocol load > > balance. Any thoughts? > > > > Woody > > CCNP > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40429&t=40213 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
