Heres the senerio: When configuring fast etherchannel between a Cat. 4000 and a Cat. 2900 using 2 links, we first plugged the links in and saw that STP disabled one of them, then on the 4000 we set the two links as fast etherchannel with the set port channel commands. From the 4000 we varified that the links were indeed bundled and working as they should, we could even see the 2900 listed as the other end. The question(s) is do you have to configure fast etherchannel at both ends? or is there some sort of negotiation process, as with trunking. Secondly from the 2900 we could not view any info or statistics that would tell us that we were using fast etherchannel or that any ports were working as such, only when consoled into the 4000 could we tell. Is this normal behavior? maybe sence we didnt do any configuring on the 2900 side.
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40430&t=40430 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
