To everyone, thank you for your advice, what you wrote seems reasonable. However it seems this would mean if there are only single channel connections (64k or 56k only) [m]route-cache and fair-queue can remain enabled. I'll try that asap.
Heiko Herold -- -- PREVINET S.p.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1 ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY > -----Original Message----- > From: Lomker, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 5:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Ancient Isdn bri wisdom ? [7:40586] > > > > Now I tried to research the reason for that and really didn't > > find any. > > It is done because ISDN lines are considered two physical > paths that are > bonded together using PPP multilink or Cisco's proprietary > bonding. If you > don't disable route caching then the tcp/ip conversation will > always be > switched out the same physical path (your big download will > only use 1/2 of > the 128k connection). It's easy to test that...just remove > it sometime. > > no-fair queue appears to be the default for asynchronous > interfaces on the > later versions of IOS. To be honest, I'm not certain why > FIFO offers better > performance than WFQ would on asynch lines; I can't find a > good explanation > on CCO right now. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40798&t=40586 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
