EIGRP question: According to Cisco's website: "Feasible distance is the best metric along a path to a destination network, including the metric to the neighbor advertising that path. A feasible successor is a path whose reported distance is less than the feasible distance."
But wouldn't a route with a distance less than the feasible distance be in the routing table already, since it had a better metric? It makes more sense to me that the feasible successor is a route with a slightly larger metric than the current route. That way if the current route dies, the next-best path is promoted. But that's not what I'm reading at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/eigrp1.html#6 So . . . whaddya say? Thanks, -Sean. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41957&t=41957 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
