>You can originate a 0.0.0.0 route from each of the ISP connected routers.
>Ideally, then each router on your internal network that receives both
>0.0.0.0 routes from both originating routers will route traffic to the
>internet based on the the 0.0.0.0 route with the best metric.

You're on the right track. But what characteristics must the default 
routes have to assure a degree of load sharing? (I'm thinking of 
something specific to OSPF)

What is their effect on load balancing from the provider to you?

>
>I'm not sure about OSPF, but where I work we have 2 connections to the
>internet at difference POPs, and this is the method we use.  Seems to give
>some load balancing, however, based on the number of users at each site....
>i.e. we have twice as many users at one site (which chooses it's closest
>internet connection for exit to the net) as we do at the other, so we really
>get a lopsided load balance, but it's what we expect.  We are soon going to
>be implementing BGP on the 2 routers that connect to the internet so what we
>can have inbound redunancy from the internet, but we'll still leave the
>lopsided load balancing in place as to really load balance across our
>internet connections would each bandwidth on our OC-12, which we don't
>want....
>
>Mike W.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" 
>Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
>Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 2:51 PM
>Subject: (correction) Method and Process Scenario 5: OSPF Multihoming
>[7:42092]
>
>
>>  Your enterprise runs OSPF internally and only takes default from one
>>  ISP, but at multiple POPs.  What would this suggest you could do to
>>  achieve a degree of load-sharing among the POPs?
>>
>>  Assume you do not run BGP. What can you do and what are its limitations?
>>
>>  Don't focus on the configuration commands as what mechanisms will be
>required.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42139&t=42139
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to