Sigh. IOS 12.1. As far as I can see, the useful stuff for this comes in
at 12.2. I don't seem to be able to configure a service policy in the FR
map class.
Thanks for the hint, though.
JMcL
----- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 24/04/2002 08:01 am -----
"Lupi, Guy"
23/04/2002 11:50 am
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: QoS - WRED and FRTS [7:42284]
If your IOS supports it, you can configure a service policy within your
frame relay map class, and specify WRED or RED within it. Take a look at
CBWFQ on CCO, it may be what you are looking for.
~-----Original Message-----
~From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
~Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:16 PM
~To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~Subject: QoS - WRED and FRTS [7:42284]
~
~
~Hi all,
~I'm looking at the pros and cons of WRED as an option in our
~network, but
~I've come across a bit of a stumbling block.
~
~We use frame relay traffic shaping to prevent traffic from
~large-bandwidth
~frame relay accesses (at aggregating sites) from flooding
~smaller accesses
~(at regional sites). But it appears you can't configure WRED on an
~interface that has FRTS configured.
~Does anyone know a workaround to this? We're using point to point
~sub-interfaces for the PVCs.
~
~Or, is there another useful way of shaping traffic (including non-IP
~traffic) on a per-pvc basis?
~
~Thanks,
~JMcL
~
~
~
~
~Report misconduct
~and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42387&t=42284
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
