The ICMP type specified is not related to either source or destination address. It is not like a port, it is just the type of frame. You could ask why the syntax is not:
permit icmp echo any any It just isn't, possibly for historical reasons, maybe just arbitrary. More to the point, why do cisco bundle together type and code into one descriptor, such as the ridiculous *packet-too-big* keyword? rgds Marc TXK Anthony Pace wrote: > > for instance : > > access-list 101 permit icmp any host 207.122.1.5 echo > access-list 101 permit icmp host 207.122.2.3 any echo-reply > > but not > > access-list 101 permit icmp any echo-reply any > > Anthony Pace Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42609&t=42609 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
