All this might very well be a moot point if Cisco really is going to throw
out token-ring from the lab, which is the latest rumor.


""nettable_walker""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> 4/26/2002   8:40pm  Friday
>
> I bought that sim from Bernard a while back  It's great if you do not have
> the real thing.
> I bought my own 3920 a few months ago for my home lab & I can tell you
they
> are a pain to work with !!!
> Rumor was that a 128 meg version (high speed token ring) was in the works
> before the dot bomb
>
> Richard
>
> //
>
> ""Lupi, Guy""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > You could buy a 3920 simulator software package for about 75 but I
> wouldn't
> > recommend it, I prefer to have routers to test different setups with.
You
> > could go on ebay and look for 3920 scenario, there is a person named
> Bernard
> > that sells them for under 30 and he sets you up on the switch with a
> > scenario planned out.  I particularly enjoyed that because it gives you
a
> > goal to meet for the scenario.  You could also go with bradshawlabs.com
> for
> > about 75 dollars for eight hours, they have a full rack with ATM also so
> you
> > could go for both, if you are looking for more than just the one
> technology
> > I would recommend them.  The administrator there is also very helpful if
> you
> > are new to the stuff.  Those are the ones I have found useful.
> >
> > ~-----Original Message-----
> > ~From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > ~Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:01 PM
> > ~To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ~Subject: Catalyst 3920 [7:42690]
> > ~
> > ~
> > ~Does anyone know a cheap rack that has a 3920 in it?  I just
> > ~want to fiddle
> > ~with the vlan config, telnet and ping.  Ideas?!?
> > ~
> > ~
> > ~
> > ~
> > ~




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42733&t=42690
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to