Only one small flaw in logic.

The labs are NOT the same. The security lab only has IP routing , but it
also includes a PIX firewall as well as IDS and IOS FW problems.
Those are not present in the R&S lab ( Or at least this is what Im told, I
haven't actually been to the lab. 45 days and counting )


Thanks

Larry 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Owens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 7:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE communication and services [7:43714]


Sorry, I guess that wasn't very clear. Suppose you attain an R/S CCIE and
now wish to go for security or C/S. As the lab is the same for all three, is
it necessary to keep retaking the lab or will the written be enough? I
assume you probably do have to take the lab again, however since it is the
same test you have already passed,it  just seems redundant.

nrf wrote:
> 
> Uh, what?  I don't understand your question.  If you're saying that 
> you're thinking that you can just keep getting more than one C/S CCIE
> by taking
> that lab over and over again (but by passing different C/S
> writtens), then
> the answer is absolutely not.  Contrary to what many people
> believe, there
> are no different 'flavors' of the C/S.  There is only 1 C/S
> CCIE, and you're
> either a C/S CCIE or you're not.   And really, this makes
> perfect sense,
> since there is only one unified C/S lab which every C/S
> candidate takes, no
> matter which written he/she passed.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ""Jason Owens""  wrote in message 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Based on your post above, as the lab is the same general
> knowledge, would
> > you need to keep taking it, providing you have passed it
> once, to get more
> > than one CCIE? Or would the various written exams suffice?
> Just curious.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43832&t=43714
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to