Peter, Seems to me, according to this:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120 limit/120st/120st16/st_bgpnh.htm#xtocid188001 next-hop can be rewrote across IBGPs. I agree that the 2500 is doing something wrong, as the normal neighor based next-hop should only affect ebgp routes. Thanks Kent ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter van Oene" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:29 PM Subject: RE: BGP Nexthop attribute propagation using RR [7:43730] > I have not seen an IOS that offers the ability to rewrite Next_Hop on an > IBGP connection. The behavior of the GSR in this case is what you should > expect. Juniper on the other hand will rewrite Next_Hop in this same > scenario and one needs to keep that in mind if you happen to work with both. > > Pete > > > At 12:00 PM 5/9/2002 -0400, JunoGuy wrote: > >What should happen is that on any RR, the NH should not be modified. The NH > >should be the originator of the route unless you set the NHS at the entry > >point to the network. I am not a Cisco expert but this does not sound > >correct for the GSR to still send out the originating NH even when the NHS > >is set. So in this case, I believe the 2500 is acting appropriately. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43837&t=43730 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
