How about setting up two 4 port IMA groups and loadshare over them.
Your basically multlinking via IMA 4 ports and then trying to multilink
the two 4 port IMA multilinks.  If that can be done it seems pretty ugly
and potentially bug riddled.

  Dave

TMS wrote:
> 
> Hello
> 
> I have two offices in two diffrent buildings. The are connected
> for now using 4 port ATM/IMA interfaces. But 4xE1 is too small
> bandwidth for me, so I installed next 4 port ATM/IMA cards. I tryed
> multilink-group and multilink interface for create 1 logical interface
> from 2 phycials ATM/IMA links, but multilink interface is down :(
> 
> Network diagram:
> 
>     ATM2/ima0  ATM3/ima0
> C3640                                C3660
>     ATM3/ima0  ATM4/ima0
> 
> C3640 configuration:
> 
> interface ATM2/ima0
>  bandwidth 8000
>  no ip address
>  ima clock-mode independent
>  atm ilmi-enable
>  atm pvc 1 32 1 aal5snap inarp
>  multilink-group 1
> !
> interface ATM3/ima0
>  bandwidth 8000
>  no ip address
>  ima clock-mode independent
>  atm ilmi-enable
>  atm pvc 2 32 2 aal5snap inarp
>  multilink-group 1
> !
> interface Multilink 1
>  ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.252
>  no ip route-cache cef
>  no ip redirects
>  no ip proxy-arp
>  ppp multilink
>  multilink-group 1
> !
> 
> on C3660 configuration is indetical, only interfaces number and
> ip address
> are diffrent.
> 
> Interfaces status:
> 
> ATM2/ima0 is up/up (protocol,line)
> ATM3/ima0 is up/up
> Multilunk 1 is down/down
> 
> ATM3/ima0 is up/up
> ATM4/ima0 is up/up
> Multilink 1 is down/down
> 
> And idea how to resolv this problem ?
> 
> --
> TMS
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45255&t=45239
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to