>From the link I posted yesterday I quote: "(notice that policy routing is taking place before NAT)" I believe from reading your followup post to this that you have already determined this to be the case. For those that missed it the link is: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/static.html
> -----Original Message----- > From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 10:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Interface process - order of operation links wanted [7:45624] > > > anyone know some good links of Cisco router order of > operation for packets > hitting an interface, both into and out of? > > I found this one yesterday while trying to figure out why > policy routing was > not being engaged: > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/5.html > > however the example does not equate to my situation, which is: > > packet--->interface_in----------->interface_out------------->next_hop > policy routing NAT outside > NAT inside > > > what would be nice would be if policy routing occurs, then > NAT takes place. > However, based on my observations, what really happens is > that NAT occurs, > the packet is then placed into the routing process, and > policy routing is > never engaged > > it occurs to me that a lot of design problems could be > avoided if one were > cognizant of the order in which processing occurs both at the > entrance and > the egress. > > thanks > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45646&t=45646 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
