>I think following any training/certification track, if done with the intent
of increasing ones knowledge, is a beneficial >thing if you truly increase
your knowledge level. Don't do it for the paper, do it for the knowledge
you'll have and the >>abilities you'll obtain from learning.

Just wanted to say I am NOT a paper-chaser, I was just hoping that maybe
someone with a CCDP and/or a CCIE written could tell me if the design
training helped in the CCIE or if maybe more advanced routing and switching
training for the CCIE is in order - THAT is my ultimate goal - R&S CCIE (not
for the paper but the opportunities that it will afford me).

Thanks,
Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Merrill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 640-605 BCRAN Beta PASSED!! [7:45777]


>  
> I was wondering if anyone could tell me if this will count toward the
> existing CCNP track if my other exams are the current standard
> (640-50x) in
> which case I'M DONE!!!

Betas do indeed count, and if so, then you should be able to log into the
tracking syustem and see that you are indeed done. Congratulations!

> Finally, if I am in fact done, can anyone tell me if it's more 
> advantageous to go after CCDA/P or just chase the CCIE written (before 
> the new version of
> that exam is introduced).

Advantage can be a relative thing, and it's something that you should
probably determine on your own in respect to what you want to do with your
career.

I think following any training/certification track, if done with the intent
of increasing ones knowledge, is a beneficial thing if you truly increase
your knowledge level. Don't do it for the paper, do it for the knowledge
you'll have and the abilities you'll obtain from learning.

Good Luck!




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45780&t=45777
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to