Just for clarification, are you saying your topology is this?? :

7960 IP Phone -- 3002 Concentrator -- DSL Modem -- Internet -- VPN term.
pt.

Is the DSL connection Synchronous??  Or is it like 768k up / 1.0mb down?

How many hops are there between you and the VPN Termination point?

Thanks,
Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Larry Letterman
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VoIP over VPN [7:45819]

I am running iP telephony at home over a hardware vpn
3002, with a cisco 7960 ip phone. Using dsl to my provider
at 1.0 mb and the telephony works just fine.


Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Marshal Schoener
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VoIP over VPN [7:45819]


I'm using a Cisco 3000 concentrator with a Cisco 3002 harware client for
the
vpn.  1.5mb on each side...
Between NY and Malaysia.  Nobody thought we would be able to put voice
over
this VPN.  We can get 2 voice calls at a time with great quality 13,000
miles :-)
We arent even using new top of the line voice hardware.  We are using a
couple of old ITSE servers.

It goes to show that the quality of the tunnel is more important than
what
pushes the voice.
It works great!
  Regards,
    Marshal

-----Original Message-----
From: Orest Umudumov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VoIP over VPN [7:45819]


Hi group,

have anybody experience with VoIP over VPN???

Any suggestions would be appreciated

thanks in advance
Orest

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a
name
of Orest.Umudumov.vcf]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45877&t=45819
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to