So it would appear that even saying how many questions, how much time, or what a passing score is would now be considered a violation of the NDA....... whoa....
". . . (including, without limitation, questions, answers, worksheets, computations, drawings, diagrams, length and/or number of Exam segments and/or questions, . . ." Of course, I'm totally willing to honor the agreement, but I really can't understand why a candidate knowing the number of questions on an exam really matters (to Cisco). With all of the exams changing recently, I guess it's not a big thing, but does this mean that Groupstudy (Paul) needs to hit the archives and delete any messages that talk about the number of questions on an exam, their passing scores, etc? (I guess legally if one posted a message before they were require to agree to the new agreement, then it wouldn't be a violation of NDA (ex post facto-type of thing)) Mike W. "Frank Jimenez" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > FYI - I received this in the e-mail sack today. Looks like Cisco is > becoming a lot more specific about what is considered an NDA violation. > Might want to read in order to stay out of hot water.... > > http://www.cisco.com//warp/public/10/wwtraining/shortcuts/agreements > > Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47748&t=47748 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
