To be more "correct" I should have said: "Try configuring your machine(s) with addresses in the following subnets:"
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Benjamin Kessler Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 12:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: New Subnet Rule [7:47670] Try configuring your machine(s) with addresses in the following networks: 198.62.0.0/28 - e.g. 192.168.0.1-14 and 192.168.0.240/28 - e.g. 192.168.0.241-254 This would be utilizing the "all-zeros" and "all-ones" subnets of 192.168.0.0/24 You tested configuring machines in the *networks* 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.255.0/24 - not subnets of 192.168.0.0/16 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michael L. Williams Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 11:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670] I have successfully used both an "all-zeros" and an "all-ones" subnet on Windows 9x. (192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.255.0/24) Works fine. Mike W. "Kazan, Naim" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Ok, now that we know the answer to that question? Will windows support > subnets 0-255. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47757&t=47670 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
