You'd probably be well-served to distinguish between a mask you wish to use at each site vs. a mask used for the purposes of summarization. The interface or subinterface used as a gateway for these networks should probably incorporate your suggested mask within their respective configurations, since you do wish to maintain 2 or more layer 3 boundaries at each site. Routing protocol summarization statements should probably reflect the mask your supervisor specified, unless other, as-yet unmentioned considerations would prevent that.
----- Original Message ----- From: "John Brandis" To: Sent: 17 July 2002 10:56 pm Subject: OSPF Route Summary [7:49085] > G'Day All, > > A client has sent me a list of IP's that are to be used in a new global > network. Our Global network will IP is 10.64.x.x . Now, for for each > office, we will have two networks, for example, Paris is 10.64.4.0 through > to 10.64.6.0 . The only exception is Sydney, where the client will have 4 > networks, 10.64.0.0-10.64.4.0 . Now I wish to use at each site, subnet mask > 255.255.255.0 (24bit), however to summarise my routes in OSPF, my superior > has handed me this > > > Sydney 10.64.0.0./22 > Paris 10.64.0.4./23 > LA 10.64.0.6./23 > NYC 10.64.0.8./23 > > > This looks wrong to me. What am I missing. > > > John Brandis > > > > ********************************************************************** > > visit http://www.solution6.com > visit http://www.eccountancy.com - everything for accountants. > > UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk > > ********************************************************************* > This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is > confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot > use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please > notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the > message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in > this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of > Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. > ********************************************************************* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49102&t=49085 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
