Chuck wrote:
> 
> never mind - I've done a bit of testing, and it appears that
> the IP number
> that is incrementing is a count of distinct events. I.e. if I
> do a test
> ping, let it sit a while, and do another test ping, I see the
> number
> increment.
> 
> I gotta get out more.

LOL, Chuck. Good to know anyway.
> 
> 
> 
> ""Chuck""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I have a piece of equipment connected to the public internet
> for something
> > I'm doing with a friend. It is protected by an access-list
> restricting the
> > source address and the particular application.
> >
> > However, in monitoring the device, I am seeing what appear to
> be not only
> > TCP port scans, but IP protocol scans. I.e. a series of
> inquiries using
> > different successive IP protocol numbers.
> >
> > 17:43:26: datagramsize=48, IP 87: s=x.x.x.x (local),
> d=12.246.161.19, totl
> > 17:43:26: datagramsize=48, IP 87: s=x.x.x.x (local),
> d=12.246.161.19 (Fast
> > 17:43:26: datagramsize=70, IP 87: s=x.x.x.x (local),
> d=12.246.161.19 (Fast
> > 17:43:32: datagramsize=48, IP 88: s=x.x.x.x (local),
> d=12.246.161.19,
> totlen
> > 56,
> > 17:56:30: datagramsize=48, IP 90: s=x.x.x.x (local),
> d=61.37.239.23, totle
> > 17:56:36: datagramsize=48, IP 91: s=x.x.x.x (local),
> d=61.37.239.23, totle
> > ( this output is showing the reply my device is sending to
> the IP's in
> > question. )
> >
> > at least, I am assuming that the IP XX = the IP protocol
> number, as
> reported
> > by the debug.
> >
> > Just wondering if one of you security gurus might shed some
> light here,
> > seeing as how out of touch I seem to be. This one of the
> standard hacking
> > procedures? Been around a while? new because so many entities
> are now
> doing
> > a lot more to crack down on TCP port scanning?
> >
> > I checked the various registries. The behavior is coming from
> several
> > places, some Thailand, some Korea, some from customers of
> ATT.net
> >
> > Just looking to increase my awareness.
> >
> > thanks.
> >
> > Chuck
> 
> 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49407&t=49358
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to