PDM. It's just too easy. Or use CiscoWorks VMS or CSPM to manage a bunch of them.
I can't stand the cli and it's archaic language. I'd rather make sure my FW is easy to configure so I don't miss anything. If something is too complicated, you don't even know if you have problems because you are stuck fighting with configs instead of hackers. Although the a basic PIX config is easy to set up, once you start doing complicated large-scale projects and need to have complex configurations, the cli on the PIX gets ridiculous. Just my opinion. ""Georgescu, Aurelian"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > If you can live with the fact that PDM is very slow, then use PDM, it's far > more intuitive for access control (which is what PIX is made for...) > > Aurelian > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Juan Blanco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 10:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: CLI vs PDM [7:49774] > > Team, > For those security people on the Cisco World, Normally which interface do > you use the most, the CLI or the PDM. I am in the process of setting up > standards and we would like to define one for having access to our Pix. > > Thanks, > > > Juan Blanco > ******************************************************************** > The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, > but in rising every time we fall ." > -- Nelson Mandela > ******************************************************************** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49876&t=49774 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
