I haven't taken the CCIE lab yet, but first I'd think they'd want you to use
CBWFQ or LLQ, as the rest are just ancient.   Cisco is emphasizing AVVID, so
you'd probably be tested on avvid technologies.  I'd also study NBAR and
multicast, among others.   Probably dial-peers as well.

But I guess if they did ask about old qing methods, it would be someting
like this:

Use a qing method that gives priority to one q with no regard to protocol
starvation.  Then you'd use PQ

Use a qing method with no PQ and has 5 classes for you to chose from.  Then
you'd use CQ

Use a qing method that is fair to all protocols and gives preference to
higer ToS.  Then you'd use WFQ which is the default for e1 and below.

Use a qing method that meets modern requirements for voice and AVVID.  Then
it's LLQ

Use a qing methid that gives classes to traffic and wfq's the rest.  Then
that's CBWFQ.

""Jason Greenberg""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Ok fair enough, but from a CCIE lab exam question perspective, I'm
> trying to determine when to use which technique for what type of
> question.  Are there certain things that each can do that the other
> cannot?
>
> On Sat, 2002-07-27 at 10:59, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
> > CBWFQ is easier to configure and the default q is a WFQ.
> >
> >
> > ""Jay Greenberg""  wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Can anyone please explain the difference between CBWFQ and CQ?  It
seems
> > > to me that they both allow you to class traffic in a custom manner, so
> > > whats the main difference?
> > >
> > > Jay Greenberg
> --
> Jason Greenberg, CCNP
> Network Administrator
> Execulink, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49909&t=49816
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to