I don't know if EoMPLS is widespread out there (I'm sure it's out there, but
I don't know how prevalent it is), but Tranparent-LAN services, which is a
much more generalized way to provide LAN connections over the WAN,  have
been available forever.

 wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> LANE would be the solution some time ago.
>
> I think LANE is a bealtiful technology, although one would not consider to
> implement it nowadays.
>
> The problem is the propagation of layer 2 problems across your campus
> network.
>
> In the past, it was a good solution to built isolated network throughout
an
> ATM backbone, solving the problem of extending Vlans across a country for
> example.
>
> From what I know EoMPLS can substitute the functionality of LANE - provide
> layer 2 services - but I do not know if it is deployed out there.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alaerte
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "MADMAN" @groupstudy.com em 20/09/2002 16:55:04
>
> Favor responder a "MADMAN"
>
> Enviado Por:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Para:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
>
> Assunto:    Re: Which Version of ATM to Use [7:53737]
>
>
> Hopefully none!!!
>
>   ATM is mostly dead in the LAN with the advent of 100/1000M ethernet
> and 10G starting to trickle out.
>
>   I know someone will point out and exception but it will be the
> exception not the rule.
>
>   Just say no!! to LANE
>
>   Dave
>
> Ken Chipps wrote:
> >
> > I have been reading up on how to configure ATM on Cisco equipment. In
> > particular I have been looking at examples of how ATM is used in a
campus
> > network, such as to connect two buildings. The Cisco documents for the
> 8510
> > MSR for example discuss configuration using LANE clients, MPOA,
Classical
> > IP, and bridging. The part I have been unable to figure out is, in the
> real
> > world, which of these methods would I use to create a campus area
network
> > connecting together two or more buildings using ATM? For example, Cisco
> says
> > that Classical IP over ATM is only used for inband management of the ATM
> > switch router. Yet it seems to me to be the way to do this. If not, is
> LANE
> > the answer? Any help would be appreciated.
> >
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> David Madland
> CCIE# 2016
> Sr. Network Engineer
> Qwest Communications
> 612-664-3367
>
> "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston
> Churchill




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53753&t=53737
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to