Thanks guys, this answers my question. Chuck I heard you are writing an article on CertZone about 3550. Is that correct if so I look forward to reading it. it's very timely.
""Chuck's Long Road"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > -- > > www.chuckslongroad.info > like my web site? > take the survey! > > > > ""JohnZ"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Can someone correct if I am wrong here > > 191.72.1.0 > > x.x.00000001.0 > > > 191.72.2.0 > > x.x.00000010.0 > > > 191.72.4.0 > > x.x.00000100.0 > > > 191.72.12.0 > > x.x.00001100.0 > > > 191.72.21.0 > > x.x.00010101.0 > > > > > > Am I correct in supernetting this to 191.72.0.0 /19 > > 255.255.11100000.0 > > first three leftmost bits in the third octet are the only ones common to all > the subnets you mention > > yes, you have supernetted the subnets in question, plus a few more you > didn't mention Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54408&t=54403 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
