This may not be relevant since it's just the socket that changes, but you
don't have another workstation with a duplicate address, do you?  I have
seen similar symptoms from that.

JMcL
Ole D Jensen wrote:
> 
> Thanks Priscilla for a very good explanation.
> 
> The numbers were just made up, but it keeps changing from 85E8
> to E885 and
> back to 85E8 a second later.
> 
> As far as I have found out so far, 85E8 is Microsoft Endpoint
> Mapper for
> RPC, however the workstation is a Windows 98.
> 
> I will take a closer look at the workstation, but if anyone
> have a good
> tip, please let me know.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ole
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  Ole Drews Jensen
>  Systems Network Manager
>  CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I
>  RWR Enterprises, Inc.
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  http://www.RouterChief.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "Priscilla Oppenheimer" 
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 10/10/2002 11:46 AM
> Please respond to "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
> 
>  
>         To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>         cc: 
>         Subject:        Re: Novell Server node address change
> [7:55264]
> 
> 
> The number after network.node is the IPX socket number, not an
> SPX socket
> number. Some protocols, such as IPX and DDP, have a socket
> number at the
> network layer.
> 
> SPX was used by RCONSOLE. Some SNA gateways used it, though
> most used
> NetBIOS. I think some printing can use SPX. Ordinary
> client/server traffic
> uses NetWare Core Protocol (NCP), however, which resides
> directly above
> IPX
> and does not use SPX. NCP has its own build-in transport like
> behavior
> that
> is similar to the old IPX PEP and provides a semi-reliable
> delivery
> service
> for single packet exchanges (often called a ping/pong
> protocol). SPX
> behaves
> more like TCP but is way less important and not used by much.
> 
> It would be normal for a client's socket number to change if
> new
> appliations
> were started or restarted. Could you watch this user and see
> what they do?
> I
> usually blame the users. ;-) Could they be playing a game
> perhaps?
> 
> Were those numbers you told us made up to hide the details for
> security
> reasons? Can you tell us the actual numbers?
> 
> You can probably get more detailed info at novell.com, but
> here's a few
> nuggets about IPX sockets:
> 
> Socket numbers between 0x4000 and 0x7FFF are dynamic sockets;
> these are
> used
> by clients to communicate with servers. Socket numbers between
> 0x8000 and
> 0xFFFF are well-known sockets; these are assigned by Novell to
> specific
> processes. Software developers who write NetWare applications
> can ask
> Novell
> to reserve a socket number and get on the list of well-known
> sockets.
> Novell
> also reserves several sockets for use in the NetWare
> environment. Here's a
> partial list of  socket numbers.
> 
> Socket           Process
> 0x0002           Cisco IPX ping
> 0x0451           NCP server
> 0x0452           SAP 
> 0x0453           RIP 
> 0x0455           Novell NetBIOS 
> 0x0456           Diagnostics 
> 0x85BE           EIGRP
> 0x9001           NLSP 
> 0x9004           IPXWAN
> 0x9086           Novell IPX ping
> _______________________________
> 
> Priscilla Oppenheimer
> www.troubleshootingnetworks.com
> www.priscilla.com
> 
> Ole D Jensen wrote:
> > 
> > Yeah, I think you're right. I am not spending much time on the
> > NW side of
> > my network, so I can't remember all the facts by heart.
> > 
> > The apps installed on that WorkStation are the same as
> > installed on most
> > other WorkStations on my networks.
> > 
> > Ole
> > 
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >  Ole Drews Jensen
> >  Systems Network Manager
> >  CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I
> >  RWR Enterprises, Inc.
> >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >  http://www.RouterChief.com
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > "The Long and Winding Road" 
> > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 10/10/2002 10:03 AM
> > Please respond to "The Long and Winding Road"
> > 
> > 
> >         To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >         cc: 
> >         Subject:        Re: Novell Server node address change
> > [7:55264]
> > 
> > 
> > Ole, it's been a long time for me as well, but isn't that last
> > set of
> > numbers - the four after the : ( colon ) the SPX socket
> number?
> > That is
> > the
> > thing that appears to be changing.
> > 
> > 
> > Not that I would know what the change signifies. what's
> running
> > on that
> > workstation?
> > --
> > 
> > !
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ""Ole D Jensen""  wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Thanks Dave,
> > >
> > > I have tried that without any luck.
> > >
> > > The command is "reset router".
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Ole
> > >
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >  Ole Drews Jensen
> > >  Systems Network Manager
> > >  CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I
> > >  RWR Enterprises, Inc.
> > >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >  http://www.RouterChief.com
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Williams, Dave"
> > > 10/10/2002 09:40 AM
> > >
> > >
> > >         To:     'Ole D Jensen' , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >         cc:
> > >         Subject:        RE: Novell Server node address
> change
> > [7:55264]
> > >
> > >
> > > You might try and clear the routing and network tables (I
> > believe the
> > > command is "clear routes" although it's been a while) on the
> > server.
> > This
> > > will cause the server to resend SAPs to populate its
> tables.
> > Sometimes
> > > the routing tables on a Novell Server (especially 4.10) gets
> > messed up
> > and
> > > won't dump the corrupted information.
> > > Dave Williams, CCDA, CCNA, CCSA
> > > Senior Network Engineer
> > > (402) 661-2143
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ole D Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 8:40 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: OT: Novell Server node address change [7:55264]
> > >
> > > This is a good step off the Cisco topic, but since it is in
> > the network
> > > world, I'm sure at least one person on this list knows the
> > answer.
> > > I have an old Novell NetWare 4.10 running, and sometimes it
> > start
> > changing
> > >
> > > the address of one specific workstation. I have looked over
> > and over at
> > > the workstation to find a possible bug, but everything
> lookes
> > fine, and
> > > reinstalling the Novell Client has not changed anything.
> > > Every 30 seconds, the Novell Server changes the node address
> > back and
> > > forth:
> > > 10-10-02    8:20:00 am:    Server-4.10-3191
> > >         Server WORKSTATION_27
> > >         Address has changed from 00000040:123456789012:1234
> > >         to 00000040:123456789012:3412
> > >         Information came from router at 123456789012
> > > 10-10-02    8:20:01 am:    Server-4.10-3191
> > >         Server WORKSTATION_27
> > >         Address has changed from 00000040:123456789012:3412
> > >         to 00000040:123456789012:1234
> > >         Information came from router at 123456789012
> > > To avoid misunderstandings, the WORKSTATION_27 is the
> > workstation that
> > it
> > > keeps changing the address on. I am not sure if it's the
> > workstation
> > > itself that changes this address or the server, but it also
> > says that
> > the
> > > information came from router 123456789012 which is the
> > workstation.
> > > I'm sure there's a logical explanation for this.
> > > Thanks in advance for any comments,
> > > Ole
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >  Ole Drews Jensen
> > >  Systems Network Manager
> > >  CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I
> > >  RWR Enterprises, Inc.
> > >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >  http://www.RouterChief.com
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55341&t=55264
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to