I am using small polycom cameras connected to my windows XP  computers. The 
main site is frame relay T1 (CIR 500) and the remote site is 640Kbps (CIR 
256)

Here is the sample config I want to test at my remote site

!
interface Serial0
description local circuit at remote site dlci 58
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
bandwidth 640
frame-relay traffic-shaping
frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
interface Serial0.1 point-to-point
description subinterface to the main site
ip address 192.168.85.30 255.255.255.252
frame-relay class vcofr
frame-relay interface-dlci 52


access-list 110 permit ip any any dscp cs4
access-list 110 permit ip any any dscp af41
!
!
class-map video-conf
   match access-group 110
policy-map qos-policy
   class video-conf
     priority 256
class class-default
     fair-queue
!
!
map-class frame-relay vcofr
  frame-relay traffic-rate 576000 640000
  no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
  service-policy output qos-policy




>From: "John Huston" 
>Reply-To: "John Huston" 
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: videoconference over frame relay [7:56548]
>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:22:18 GMT
>
>What video equipment are you using?
>
>""johnman johnman""  wrote in message
>news:200210302119.VAB05984@;groupstudy.com...
> > Hi All
> >
> > I am configuring videoconferencing  on frame relay for two sites.
> > I wondering if someone has a sample config ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Choose an Internet access plan right for you -- try MSN!
> > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp
_________________________________________________________________
Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband.  Join now! 
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56550&t=56548
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to