let me know if you have any further questions. if need be i can connect with you guys with the right people.
/vicky -----Original Message----- From: lawrence sculark [mailto:lawz4u@;hotmail.com] Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 9:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: WLAN security matters [7:57160] vicki shar the info with all of us..please LAWRENCE A SCULARK >From: "Vicky O. Mair" >Reply-To: "Vicky O. Mair" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: WLAN security matters [7:57160] >Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 00:57:25 GMT >Received: from mc5-f32.law1.hotmail.com ([65.54.252.39]) by mc5-s15.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Sat, 9 Nov 2002 17:12:59 -0800 >Received: from groupstudy.com ([66.220.63.9]) by mc5-f32.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Sat, 9 Nov 2002 17:12:59 -0800 >Received: from localhost (mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA12501;Sun, 10 Nov 2002 01:12:58 GMT >Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.13); Sun, 10 Nov 2002 00:57:26 +0000 >Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA10846GroupStudy Mailer; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 00:57:26 GMT >Received: (from mail@localhost)by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA10842GroupStudy Mailer; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 00:57:25 GMT >Message-Id: >X-GroupStudy-Version: 3.1.1a >X-GroupStudy: Network Technical >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Precedence: bulk >Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2002 01:12:59.0288 (UTC) FILETIME=[4EF29180:01C28856] > >hi there, > >ping me offline and i can direct you to folks who have a (hw) solution which >not only secures wlans but also does a good job protecting your overall >backbone security. > >/vicky > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of >Carlos Fragoso Mariscal >Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 9:19 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: WLAN security matters [7:57160] > > >Hello, > >I'm doing a research for the deployment of a secure implementation >of a wireless 802.11a/b environment. > >Until WPA (Wireless Protected Access) from the WiFi alliance comes >to life next year, I realised that WEP is the only air-side Layer 2 >(crackeable) encryption protocol. This lack of security requires >other upper-layer protocols to do this job such as IPSec or VPN >implementations. Those solutions seem to be not very scalable indeed. > >I would like to know which kind of implementations are the most >preferred and desirable for you. Is there anyone managing any >secure deployment similar? >I have heard a little bit about Cisco vendor implementation (LEAP) >but I suppose it only works with both APs and client cards from Cisco. > >Authentication is a first step, 802.1x could help us to authenticate >users and establish a secure VLAN-based traffic, but it is not a >solution for air-side sniffing and spoofing. Is IPSec or VPN the >only solution? > >If anyone has any documentation or slides about LEAP, 802.1x either >wireless secure deployments, they will be appreciated. > >Thank you, > >-- Carlos Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57179&t=57160 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
