[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hi, > >You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. Because >the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required >to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a >spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending >Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). > >PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL >YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED. > > >By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: > >1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. > >2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. > >3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com > >4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. > >5. The message is NOT inflammatory. > >6. The message is NOT a test message. > >To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once >confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. > > >Welcome to GroupStudy.com! > > >------ORIGINAL MESSAGE--------- > >>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 12 05:06:27 2002 >Received: from fed1mtao02.cox.net (fed1mtao02.cox.net [68.6.19.243]) > by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA22746 > GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 05:06:27 GMT >Received: from cox.net ([68.104.162.8]) by fed1mtao02.cox.net > (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP > id > for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 00:05:56 -0500 >Message-ID: >Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 22:05:56 -0700 >From: "Kim O'Connor" >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1 >X-Accept-Language: en-us >MIME-Version: 1.0 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: MLS Question >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >I have a question about MLS. I am reading Webb's BCMSN book, and I have >come across a statement that does not make any sense to me. On page >234, in the first paragraph, it reads: > >MLS-SE supports only one flow mask for all MLS-RPs that are serviced by >the MLS-SE. If the MLS-SE detects different flow masks from different >MLS-RPs for which the MLS-SE is performing Layer 3 switching, the MLS-SE >changes its flow mask to the most specific flow detected. However, if a >more specific flow mask is in effect, a less specific flow mask is applied. > >It is the last 2 sentences that I am having a problem with. It seems >to say that chooses the more specific flow mask and then in the next >sentence seems to contradict that information. Can some one clear this >up for me? > >TIA, > >Kim O'Connor, CCNA
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57407&t=57407 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
