Ok Eric,

I just have the impression that something was wrong because my name was
just after what you wrote.

Thanks and Best Regards,
Alaerte

Eric Polin  em 11/21/2002 07:31:59 PM





Para: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" 
cc:



Assunto:    RE: GRE on Cisco routers [7:57836]





-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alaerte-

Sorry, i am a bit confused as to what you are saying. What you have
quoted was what i had written..

thanks,

Eric




- -----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:28 PM
To: Eric Polin
Subject: RE: GRE on Cisco routers [7:57836]



Hi Eric,

Could you tell me where did you get the message in you email:

"Hello everyone, i am new to the list, and have been studying cisco
for a
month now, i thought this list would be a great way of getting to
know/understand the community, and would also be a great resource for
me.


alaerte -

I have been using freebsd for a while now, and have used vpn for a
little"


Thanks








Eric Polin  em 11/21/2002 02:36:28 PM





Para: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:



Assunto:    RE: GRE on Cisco routers [7:57836]





- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


>> *** So instead of getting the EIGRP routes via Tunnel 0 inteface, I'm
>> getting it via the outgoing interface (serial 0), & the IPSec still
works.  So what am I
>> missing, and how does it make a difference if I use GRE over IPSec?  I
also tested
>> RIPv2 & getting similar results.



Hello everyone, i am new to the list, and have been studying cisco for a
month now, i thought this list would be a great way of getting to
know/understand the community, and would also be a great resource for me.


alaerte -

I have been using freebsd for a while now, and have used vpn for a little
while as well. In *bsd there are a couple packages which have worked well
with our cisco (3600x). For bsd i have been using racoon/zebra. Well, as i
started to get into zebra, which does rip/ospf/bgp/foo.. i noticed that for
a ipsec vpn, it would not take broadcast/multicast traffic over the tunnel.
I then layered gre into the tunnel, and whalla, the broadcast and multicast
messages were dropping over to the other side of the tunnel. I am not sure
why gre takes it and ipsec doesnt. Remember, i am very new to cisco, so i
am
not sure how that side works. But try to use that approach, and maybe it
will help you.

cheers-

Eric


- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0 (Build 349) Beta

iQA/AwUBPd0aMaUUXFhoQKvpEQLNTACfcG61THlR7HSVwFeu0gUwAb12aLUAn1Y0
FO7h6YYILpNWB20T/Yrjr1TA
=vDsv
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0 (Build 349) Beta

iQA/AwUBPd1feaUUXFhoQKvpEQL1TQCeN2RSGaVPzjUdryCkzfCmRC7guPoAoN1y
THQmxYJEEsgE3VcUrBoMrvWv
=LzKl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57872&t=57836
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to