thanks for your response. If ISL and 802.1q frame header has no space for vlan name, it means doesn't matter if Switch A and B are within the same VTP domain or not, whatever vtp modes they are on, as long as the vlan number is the same, vlan name does not matter.
The Long and Winding Road wrote: > ""pauldongso"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >>Hi All, >> >>come across this scenario: >> >>Switch A --------------------- switch B >>(vtp wally) trunk (vtp world) >> | | >> | | >> PC 1 PC 2 >>(vlan 2,name access) (vlan 2, name access) >> ip 10.0.0.1 ip 10.0.0.2 >> >>1. pc 1 is able to ping pc2. >>2. when vlan 2 in switch A change name to be access-new, >> will PC 1 still be able to ping PC2? will the vlan name >> take any effect? > > > > CL: assuming all switches are vtp server, the answer is that the name change > becomes universal, so there is no effect. > > CL: sorry, but I am unable to provide an empirical answer regarding vtp > transparent. the theoretical answer is there would be no effect if the same > vlan number were to have two different names on two different switches. > there is no place in the 802.1 header for a vlan name. all that matters is > the number. > > > > > > >>Thanks in advance. >> >>Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58001&t=57985 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
