""Oliver Hensel"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi. > > I'd simply use secured switchports fixed to one MAC address > and a DHCP server which gives out IP addresses based on MAC > address. You could also use static ARP entries (this would > need to be done to all the machines on the network though). > > But I can not really see a scalable Solution. 100 stations? > Error prone and a maintenance nightmare. > > Perhaps someone has a more elegant solution?
I'm almost certain that 802.1x could be useful here. > > Regards, > Oliver > > Aaron Ajello sagte: > > This might sound silly, but could you use a cat 5000 with an RSM or a > > 6000 with an MSM?. Assign each port on the switch to a seperate vlan, > > then create a bunch of one ip address dhcp scopes on the RP and assign > > one scope per vlan. This would have the result of assigning one ip > > address per switch port. You'd probably want to knock the lease time > > way down. > > > > Then everytime a computer boots up, it'll be assigned to whichever vlan > > corresponds to the port it's attached to and the host will automatically > > get the same ip address every time. You could also use a switch without > > an RP and use a router on a stick for the same thing. > > > > Someone out there probably has a better idea. > > Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > Oliver Hensel > telematis Netzwerke GmbH > mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Siemensstrasse 23, D-76275 Ettlingen > Tel: +49 (0) 7243-3448-0, Fax: -498 > visit us: http://telematis.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58233&t=58233 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
