Hi, Thanks your details information again. However, is it possible to do QoS based on IP precedence? (Our customer voice-gateway CPE already rewrite the value to 5, so we want to make use of this to implement QoS. Also, we checked that the rest of data traffic will have default precedence value 0)
Sample configuration: class-map match-all normal match ip precedence 0 class-map match-all voice match ip precedence 5 ! ! policy-map policy class voice bandwidth percent 50 class normal bandwidth percent 25 interface ATM1/0.100 point-to-point ip address 30.0.0.2 255.255.255.0 pvc 1/100 service-policy output policy If "bandwidth" is the min. guaranteed bandwidth during congestion. How about the "priority" command? Also, I checked the documentation the sum of bandwidth allocated cannot exceed 75% of the link. "The remaining 25% of total bandwidth is kept reserve for unclassified traffic and routing traffic..." Therefore, as above, I can only define 50% to voice and 25% to data. Does it mean I will lost some bandwidth? (I cannot apply max-reserved-bandwidth to sub-interface) Many Thanks again. ivan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59151&t=58784 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
