""Brian"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > pix is a nat box, curious why youre doing that on the router?? > double nat can work, havent heard of it with this combo though.
in general, there is no reason that double nat will NOT work. I have a customer network or two doing just that. I'm not familiar with the 675, and you are correct - I would want to know more about the configurations as well. Maybe an issue doing double PAT? as opposed to true double NAT or NAT to PAT ( which is the case with my customers ) > > Bri > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andy Barkl" > To: > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 2:45 PM > Subject: PIX behind DSL router [7:60307] > > > > I'm trying to configure a PIX to sit behind a Cisco 675 DSL router (or > > is it a modem in this case) and I'm not having much luck. NAT is > > functioning on the router but I can't get from the LAN through the PIX > > and router to the Internet. > > This is a double-NAT scenario. Is this possible? > > > > I have tried adding all the usual static routes for the router and PIX > > with no success. Any first-hand experience or ideas? > > > > 10.0.0.0--->PIX--->192.168.1.0--->router--->Internet > > > > Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60312&t=60307 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
