all ports share a 16MB buffer space. (4000 docs) for ethernet interfaces, i only found a generic allocation of ether and fast ethr blades, 192KB per interface, 160 for outboud and 24 for inbound, but i found this info in the (5000 docs), they made it sound like it's generic to ethernet but i'm not sure.
""Vicuna, Mark"" a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > yes, alot of traffic is flowing through :-) and no wasn't related to any > kind of attack. > > The 18mpps or 48mpps is more to do with the switch fabric, not related to > the tx rx buffer(s) that are allocated per port. > > the issue was immediately resolved when i hard coded port settings. just > wanted to have an idea of the size of buffering allocated on these ports > (hardware specific of course). > > > cheers, > mark. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:17 PM > To: Vicuna, Mark; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: RX port buffers on cat4000's [7:61248] > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/46.html > > * In-Lost - Packets which could not be received since > the input buffers are full. Reason: Excessive input > rate of traffic. > > * Delay Exceed - This is an indication of the number > of frames discarded because of excessive delay in the > switching process. Reason/Cause: Severe problem with > the switch. Open a case with the Cisco TAC > > I'm guessing the PIX connection has lots of traffic > (probably constant). maybe some sort of attack was > going on at this time. Might be a combination of > devices attached to that blade. There is no buffer > adjustments I know of. > > Also the sup2 on 4006 does 18 Mpps , whereas a > sup3/sup4 can do 48 Mpps. > > --- "Vicuna, Mark" wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Just wondering if anyone has figures for the size of > > rx buffers for cat 4000 > > ports? Had a issue today where a port was connected > > to a pix 535 manually > > set at half/100 (yep you read right), the switch > > port was at auto/auto. The > > rate of In-Lost (rx buffer filling up) errors was on > > average 5 per minute > > (among all the other errors of course). > > > > I have seen In-Lost and delay-exceeds rise up for > > mis-settings to servers, > > but the pix connection was showing some pretty fast > > counter stats > > > > Hard to find these small details sometimes in doco.. > > maybe anyone here from > > cisco can advise? > > > > the mod on the 4006 is a ws-x4424-gb-rj45 (hw 1.5) > > with a supII (hw 3.2, > > gsp 7.1(2.0), nmp 7.1(2)) > > > > > > Cheers, > > M > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61297&t=61248 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
