Ya that is part of the reason and most likely the path is shorter between GB and Mil than Mil and and Madison and there may be more switches and/or and NNI between Mil and Madison, more congestions, etc...
Dave Stull, Cory wrote: > 3 locations. Milwaukee, Madison, Greenbay. Milwaukee and Madison both > have a 128k port 64k CIR. Greenbay has full T1 with 64k CIR. > >>From Milwaukee why is Greenbay's ping response times almost 3 times faster > than Madisons? Wouldn't Milwaukee being the bottle neck of 128k port rate > make both ping response times closer to the same? Or is this like the > highway theory of Greenbay has a Full T1 most of the way so you can go > faster on that portion of the drive therefore the ping response times are > much faster?? > > Thanks for any input. > > > > > Cory -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62523&t=62517 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
