Comments in line.

""Priscilla Oppenheimer""  wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Richard Burdette wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm studying for the Support exam using the CiscoPress books
> > and Trouble
> > Shooting Campus Networks from Priscilla.  I must say that the
> > Trouble
> > Shooting book is excellent on its own, but especially so as
> > compared to the
> > CiscoPress offerings.
>
> Thanks. :-)
>
> >
> > Anyway I've been playing around with NetMonitor
>
> Are you referring to the NetMonitor application from ModemWizard?

I'm speaking of the 'ole Network Monitor utility from Microsoft.  The other
utility I was working with that also recorded these packets is a beta
application that runs on top of WinCap.

Well, now that I've restarted the system these broadcasts appear to have
stopped.

>
> > and also some
> > newer Unix
> > ported packet capture utilities on various platforms and came
> > across
> > something on a .Net Enterprise server that has me puzzled.
>
> So you are running NetMonitor on the .Net server?
>
> > My
> > system is
> > continually (once a second) broadcasting to a destination port
> > of 192.
>
> UDP? Probably since TCP doesn't usually broadcast. That is strange.
>
> >  A
> > lookup of ports reveals this is for OSU network monitoring
> > (Oregon State U).
>
> Uh, Ohio State. Don't blame us Oregonians. :-)

Sorry, I think it does have something to do with Oregon State....

One second, I think I've found the culprit just know from the website
http://www.net.princeton.edu/software/osunms_probe/osunms_probe.8.html I
found the following;

***********
The probe packet is simply a UDP packet broadcasted to port 192. The
packet's IP source is the (primary) IP address assigned to the interface
specified on the commandline; the packet's UDP source port is specified with
the -P option, or defaults to 55830.
The UDP payload consists of one byte of x'01' followed by 115 bytes of
x'00'. (This is the probe packet observed to be used by version 1.2 of
Apple's AirPort Admin Utility to locate potential Apple AirPort
Basestations, and by Lucent's RG Setup to locate potential Lucent ORiNOCO
Residental Gateways.

Because the program does not examine the response packet to determine if the
respondent is indeed one of these devices, it is possible it will provoke
responses from other devices listening on that port as well.

************

On this system I will switch between my Orinoco wireless and the NIC
depending on what I'm doing on my network.  For some reason on this server,
it will not allow me to disable the Wireless adapter.  As a workaround I
disable the Radio that essntially kills that connection allowing me to then
enable the NIC.  What must have happened is that the system did not realize
what I had done and begun to look for the AP.  Sounds good anyway.

Sorry for the confusion.




>
> > Anyway, could anyone shed some light on what application or
> > service on the
> > server is causing this?
>
> I have a theory. I wonder if it is NetMonitor itself. It might be looking
> for banner ads or gathering data for one of its tests?
> Do you see this traffic even when not using NetMonitor? Try Ethereal. It's
a
> great free protocol analyzer.
>
> > I have always found tracking down an
> > application
> > causing packet output to be hard to find, does anyone have tips
> > on resolving
> > this type of scenario?
>
> It's truly a pain. The official list from the Internet Assigned Numbers
> Authority just says this, as you probably know:
>
> osu-nms         192/tcp    OSU Network Monitoring System
> osu-nms         192/udp    OSU Network Monitoring System
> #                          Doug Karl
>
> You could ask Doug?? :-)
>
> Are you sure it's not port 92, instead of port 192? That would make more
> sense. Here's what IANA says about 92:
>
> npp              92/tcp    Network Printing Protocol
> npp              92/udp    Network Printing Protocol
>
>
> Or maybe 192 is Hex?? Probably not though. That would be 402, which
doesn't
> seem any more likely:
>
> genie           402/tcp    Genie Protocol
> genie           402/udp    Genie Protocol
> #                          Mark Hankin
>
> Sorry I can't be more help.
>
> Priscilla
>
> >
> > Thanks...
> >
> > Richard




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64023&t=64011
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to