The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> 
> ""Priscilla Oppenheimer""  wrote in
> message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > KW S wrote:
> > >
> > > Can someone tell me what is the function of the protocol
> field
> > > in the IP header.
> > >
> > > I get a little confused after reading from some many
> sources.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > kws
> >
> > The Protocol field identifies the next layer, in other words
> the type of
> > payload that IP is carrying. Almost every protocol has a way
> of
> identifying
> > what the next layer is. The recipient layer uses this
> information to
> figure
> > out which process to pass the payload to.
> 
> 
> Given previous discussions here regarding "next layer" 

What discussions of next layer? 

> may I
> offer that this
> does not refer to the "next OSI layer" but rather something
> else?
> 

I'm referring to layers in a packet obviously. The word "layer" is widely
used in the English language without OSI attached to it.

Packets come in layers. 

For example, recently I got the Server Message Block (file sharing protocol
used on Windows) running across a GRE tunnel that was being carried on a VPN
that was crossing a DLSw+ serial link using DLSW+ TCP encapsulation. Here
were the layers in the packets:

HDLC
TCP
802.5
802.2
SNAP
IP
IPSec
IP
GRE
TCP
NetBIOS
SMB

Does that look like the OSI 7-layer model to you?

> Otherwise we will have to go through anopther cycle of people
> thinking they
> are being told that OSPF operates at layer 4. :->

Read Howard's discussions of the control, management, and user planes.

> 
> 
> >
> > Ethernet II has EtherType.
> > IEEE 802.3 has the 802.2 Logical Link Control (LLC) Service
> Access Points
> > (SAPs).
> > IP has the Protocol field.
> > UDP and TCP have port numbers.
> >
> > The IP Protocol field identifies the next layer as being one
> of these:
> >
> > Protocol Type in Decimal
> > ICMP       1
> > IGMP       2
> > IP         4 (tunneling)
> > TCP        6
> > IGRP       9
> > UDP       17
> > GRE       47
> > ESP       50
> > AH        51
> > EIGRP     88
> > OSPF      89
> >
> > There are others but those are the most common.
> > _______________________________
> >
> > Priscilla Oppenheimer
> > www.troubleshootingnetworks.com
> > www.priscilla.com
> 
> 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65795&t=65718
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to