KW S wrote:
> 
> Dear all
> 
> I have a little confusion here
> 
> Layer 3 switching is hardware based routing.
> 
> If this is correct, does it means that switching path in a
> router like netflow 

I think netflow on a router is software based, isn't it? But it's certainly
helping in the job of switching packets using Layer 3 information. It's
doing Layer 3 switching, whether it's hardware-baed or not.

> and distributed switching is the same as L3
> switching

Distributed switching could certainly be called L3 switching. I don't think
Cisco uses that term, but it's technically accurate and goes along with your
definition that Layer 3 switching is hardware-based routing of packets
(forwarding of packets).

If you look at older books and documents, before LAN switches existed, and
we just had bridges and routers, Cisco router documentation used to say this:

A router has two jobs:

path determination
switching of packets

That confused people when LAN swtiches came out, so they started saying

A router has two jobs:

path determination
forwarding of packets

A router works at Layer 3. That switching (or forwarding or routing) of
packets always was "Layer 3 switcing," even though nobody called it that. We
were doing "Layer 3 switching" long before marketing started using the term
to specifically mean "hardward-based routing," and before the new-fangled
switches that are really routers with a lot of switch ports built in came out.

It's just a matter of packaging. That's something marketing people deal with.

We are engineers. We use the term switching in the same way engineers have
used it for many years when talking about switching telegraph signals,
telephone calls, current through an electrical circuit, trains on a train
track, and packets through an internetworking device.

Don't forget that. WE ARE ENGINEERS. :-) We do the real work. Marketing
makes up names for what we do, packages what we do, and gives advice to the
other people who do the real work, the SALES people. They can make up any
names they want. The names don't really have much to do with operating and
troubleshooting networks.

Priscilla

> 
> Thanks
> 
> KWS
> 
> 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65955&t=65916
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to